LT NSE filing

Larsen & Toubro Assigned ESG Rating of 'Adequate' with Score 53

The RealCase readLow impact Neutral

Larsen & Toubro Limited received an ESG rating score of 53, categorized as 'adequate', from ESG Risk Assessments & Insights Limited on May 29, 2026. This rating was assigned independently based on public data.

Why it matters

The ESG rating of 'adequate' is a standard disclosure and does not immediately signal a significant change in the company's operations or financial performance.

The market read

The assignment of an ESG rating, categorized as 'adequate', is a factual disclosure and does not inherently represent a positive or negative development for the company.

Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT) has been assigned an ESG rating score of "53" under the category "adequate" by ESG Risk Assessments & Insights Limited on May 29, 2026. This rating was independently assigned by ESG Risk Assessments & Insights Limited based on publicly available information, and the company did not engage their services for this assessment.

The rating can be accessed via the following link: https://india360.esgrisk.ai/Accounts/Ratinglist.

Filing to action

What to do with a filing like this

Larsen & Toubro Limited filed this with the NSE as a statutory disclosure, categorised under esg reports. It is a primary document, not a recommendation, and the desk marks it low impact, the band that almost never moves a portfolio on its own.

That call is the part a filing cannot make for you. On RealCase, SEBI-registered research analysts and investment advisers read announcements like this one and turn the ones that matter into actions inside their model portfolios: a change in weight, a hold, or nothing at all. You are not left working out which of the roughly 250 filings published each day needs a response. The portfolio you follow is updated when a filing actually warrants it, with the reason written down.

See the model portfolios
Primary source

A plain-language summary of a public exchange filing by Larsen & Toubro Limited. Read the original for the full detail.

View original filing